Juvenile Computer Hacker Pleads Guilty
Arizona Free Press
← Back to
National News
Boston, MA... A male juvenile, who has been widely known in the hacker underground
by his online moniker, Dshocker, pled guilty in U.S. District Court to computer
intrusion, interstate threats, and wire fraud, stemming from hacking, botnet and swatting activities. In accordance with federal law, the juvenile was not publicly named.
United States Attorney Michael J. Sullivan and Warren T. Bamford, Special Agent in
Charge of the Federal Bureau of Investigation - Boston Field Division, announced that a 16-year-old male juvenile, whose name is not being released to protect his privacy, of
Massachusetts, pled guilty before U.S. District Court Judge Dennis F. Saylor, IV, to an
Information charging him with delinquency related to computer intrusion, interstate threats and wire fraud.
At the hearing, the prosecutor told the Court that had the case proceeded to trial, the
government would have proven that, from 2005-2008, the defendant (1) hacked into multiple
corporate computer systems and took command of thousands of other computers in a botnet (a network of infected computers), directing them to perform cyberattacks on victim computer servers; (2) placed hoax emergency telephone calls to elicit armed police responses from SWAT (special weapons and tacticsÂÂÂ) police teams and others, as well as reported phony bomb threats, and (3) made fraudulent credit card purchases with stolen credit cards. His swatting activities created a serious risk of physical harm to innocent victims, and the multiple bomb threats caused extensive disruptions to important public services. Furthermore, the defendants hacking activities were disruptive to major companies computer systems, and they wreaked havoc on tens of thousands of computers that were compromised.
While Judge Saylor will impose sentence, the defendant has agreed to the imposition of
an 11-month prison sentence, which would take place in a juvenile detention facility. Had he been tried as an adult, he would have faced a maximum sentence of 10 years in prison, to be followed by 5 years of supervised release, a fine of up to $250,000 and restitution.
The case was investigated by the Federal Bureau of Investigation.