Power Struggle Erupts in Pinal County Over Controversial ICE Partnership

A dispute between County Attorney Brad Miller and the Board of Supervisors raises questions about who holds the authority to strike agreements with federal immigration officials. Tensions are escalating in Pinal County after a disagreement between County Attorney Brad Miller and the Board of Supervisors over a partnership with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). The board recently ruled that Miller’s office lacked the legal authority to enter into a 287(g) agreement—a program that allows local agencies to collaborate with ICE on immigration enforcement efforts. Following consultation with outside legal experts, the board determined that only it has the power to approve contracts between the county and federal agencies. Supervisors also argued that the county attorney’s office, which does not have arrest powers, cannot legally engage in a 287(g) partnership. Miller, however, has pushed back on that interpretation. In an interview with KTAR News 92.3 FM, he maintained that his office serves as the county’s chief law enforcement entity and acted within its rights when it signed the agreement. He said ICE officials confirmed the deal remains valid and independent of board oversight. According to Miller, the arrangement primarily focuses on information sharing and coordination rather than direct enforcement actions. He described the effort as a way to enhance communication and officer safety, allowing local law enforcement to access federal databases for background checks and intelligence support. Despite the board’s cease-and-desist order, Miller has indicated he plans to move forward with the partnership. The standoff may soon head to court if no compromise is reached. The Pinal County dispute highlights broader debates across Arizona over local involvement in federal immigration enforcement, as communities continue to grapple with the balance between public safety, legal authority, and civil rights.